However, MobileFirst Server is augmented with server-side developer code. This scenario is based on a real customer scenario. The hardware-sizing calculator is based on a scenario that was tested in IBM Labs. How many servers required for a typical MFP install?ĭepend upon the workload and other parameters like security and number of projects you can isolate components on different servers. Note: IBM recommendation is to use WebSphere Liberty for application server platform. WebSphere Application Server (Standalone and ND).What is the Supported application server platforms for MFP?įollowing application Servers are supported from MobileFirst platform foundation server. Fix packs and fixes a available on fix central to download. Latest version of MFP application Server is v8.0. What is the latest version of MobileFirst Platform Foundation (MFP) ? What you need to know before building your MFP environments Intended Audience Intended audience for this article is Administrators who are planning to build an MFP environment. There was a time–when Apple was young–when enterprises were the innovators, early adopters.This article provides answers to frequently asked MFP Install/Configuration questions.Extending that open hand to the downtrodden salaried masses must surely bring a tear to one’s eye.īeing unexpected and yet explanatory of the state of technology today, the partnership between IBM and Apple is, in my opinion, the most significant technology news of 2014.Īs a romance, it is at least as newsworthy as the divorce of Wintel was in 2012. Apple management has made clear that they are being more inclusive and open minded. They may be employed by laggards but they are people too. Simultaneously we must applaud Apple for accepting that there are throngs of unwashed masses laboring in cubicles which deserve to be served. Yet they are practices which still elude the spec-driven enterprise software wastelands. These are concepts and ideas which now permeate app design best practices. The number of user actions, the number of screens to wade through have been ruthlessly culled. The quality of the experience is evident at first sight. IBM has had to essentially say no to those who buy and yes to those who are paid to use. This resistance requires saying No to those who specify and are thus authorized to purchase software and hardware. We must applaud IBM for having the courage to resist the featuritis which plagues enterprise software design. We were witnesses to apps which appeared to be designed for users They were not designed for committees that prepare checklists of requirements. The recent apps release showed just how transformative this relationship could be. intuitive) solutions and an increase in productivity, benefiting the buyer. The combination increases adoption of mobile (i.e. IBM offers modularized access to databases through its own APIs and obtains credible client experiences. 1 Simultaneously IBM intends to connect data warehouses at those same enterprises to their employed users.īoth can achieve their goals better if they join forces: Apple offers assistance and expertise while obtaining access and lubrication for orifice entry. Apple intends to accelerate the adoption of its mobile platforms among the remaining non-adopters: enterprises–a group which, by now, qualifies as laggards. The convergence of interests which was consummated into a deal this year stems from the migration of computing around what has come to be called “mobile”. ![]() IBM was forced out of building computers and into services and consulting while Apple moved to make devices and the software and services which make its hardware valuable. It is no longer as simple as selling beige boxes. Since the early 1980s, “computing” came to be modularized into hundreds, perhaps thousands of business models. The companies’ antagonism was due to being once aimed at the same business: computing. It indicates and evidences change on a vast scale. Nostalgia aside, this new union is profoundly important. As I wrote on the date they changed their Facebook status, the two companies were antagonists for the better part of twenty years and their rapprochement was met with a shrug mostly because yet more decades passed since. As corporate romances go, IBM and Apple’s must rank among the most unexpected.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |